![]() We’re the bran muffin of journalism.īut you know what? We change lives. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.” My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. “Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. Felver notes that the sheer size of the watershed and the number of governments, businesses, and landowners in the system will make progress slow to realize.Ībout a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”: “It speaks to the fact that the bay is becoming more resilient,” he says. Still, he believes that the findings in the Chesapeake Bay Program’s Barometer report indicate an overall trend of improvement. “It is going to be a little bit harder to get the job done.” “The weather just makes such a huge difference,” says Dr. A State of the Bay report from the nonprofit Chesapeake Bay Foundation found that heavy storms flushed unusually high amounts of pollutants into the estuary in 2018, undoing some progress. Felver.Īn emerging challenge for restoration efforts is climate change, particularly with increased rainfall totals and severe storm systems. “That was a big factor in contributing to the overall health of the bay,” says Ms. The TMDL identifies how much nitrogen, phosphorous, and sediment pollution the bay can handle and still support aquatic life, and requires the states in the watershed, as well as the District of Columbia, to take action to reduce levels below that maximum load. Felver attribute much of the progress to the establishment in 2010 of a total maximum daily load pollution limit by the U.S. Safety They moved to Vermont for climate safety. ![]() That could stop the meltdown, if not the shutdown. The least lawmakers can do is look the part, they argue. Schumer did not drop the dress code for staffers on the Senate floor, few enter the chamber and the standards in the hallways have already changed.)But for others, there’s a feeling that from schools to churches to Congress, America is dropping the standards that cultivate – and earn – respect. Many say such diversity makes for better policymaking, as we wrote about last year. (Though Mr. ![]() Journalists and staffers have happily followed suit. For some, relaxing dress codes – which are expensive to follow, particularly for young staffers – is a step toward greater equity, enabling people from a wider range of socioeconomic backgrounds to work on the Hill. Schumer – wore dress sneakers to the Oval Office. Congressional leaders sparked controversy this spring when all but one of them – Mr. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania has frequently sported hoodies and shorts since his return from being treated for clinical depression, though he would vote from the edge of the Senate floor so as not to break the unwritten rules. There is a language, choreography, and, yes, costumes. The unwritten rules of congressional theater were being challenged well before Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer issued his edict Friday.Flip-flops, wigs, and sweaty gym shirts had already made Senate appearances. It gets to standards, and tone, and trust.So much of Congress is theater. senators can wear whatever they want on the Senate floor, sparking an uproar. Wait, the government is about to shut down, and we’re arguing about outfits?But this is about something deeper than a dress code.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |